Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video36 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jean Smart results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 144 faulty-reasoning hits from 36 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (2,094 of 28,364 speakers). This Jean Smart is worse (more manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group.
Jean Smart
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 36
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

93% percentile
025507510092.6% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos36 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Burden of Proof: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of ProofSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos