Speaker summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video84 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jean Callahan results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 66.7% saturation with 67 hits. Analysis detected 260 faulty-reasoning hits from 84 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (15,631 of 28,364 speakers). This Jean Callahan is better (less manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group.
Jean Callahan
Speaker details
Total words: 84
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510044.9% percentile
27.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos84 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 66.7%66.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 37.3%37.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 16.0%16.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 18.0%18.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 18.7%18.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 26.0%26.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 12.7%12.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 66.7%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 37.3%, sitewide 5.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 26.0%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos