Speaker summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video285.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These JB Poersch results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Anecdotal, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 98 hits. Analysis detected 740.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 285.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (25,734 of 28,364 speakers). This JB Poersch is better (less manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group.
JB Poersch
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 285.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

9% percentile
02550751009.3% percentile
9.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos285.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 22.9%22.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 13.1%13.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 8.9%8.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 4.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 9.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos