Speaker summary
68% 3 analyzed articles/videos 126.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Javier Bardem results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 45.8% saturation with 92 hits . Analysis detected 524.092 faulty-reasoning hits from 126.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 19.7% and a BS Rank of 32% (19,438 of 28,364 speakers). This Javier Bardem is better (less manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group. Javier Bardem
Speaker details
Total words: 126.667
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.5% percentile 19.7% BS Score3 analyzed videos126.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 45.8% 45.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 28.4% 28.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 34.8% 34.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 19.4% 19.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 19.9% 19.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 23.9% 23.9% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 15.4% 15.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 15.4% 15.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 29.3% 29.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 9.9% 9.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 45.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 34.8%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 29.3%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 23.9%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 1.1% Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 9.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst