Speaker summary
68%3 analyzed articles/videos126.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Javier Bardem results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 45.8% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 524.092 faulty-reasoning hits from 126.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 19.7% and a BS Rank of 32% (19,438 of 28,364 speakers). This Javier Bardem is better (less manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group.
Javier Bardem
Speaker details
Total words: 126.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

32% percentile
025507510031.5% percentile
19.7% BS Score3 analyzed videos126.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 45.8%45.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 28.4%28.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 34.8%34.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 23.9%23.9%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 15.4%15.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 15.4%15.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 29.3%29.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 9.9%9.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 45.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 34.8%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 29.3%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 23.9%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 1.1%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 9.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos