Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Eoghan Gilmartin results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 922 hits . Analysis detected 6,616 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,364 authors). This Eoghan Gilmartin is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Eoghan Gilmartin
Author details
Total words: 6,068
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.2% 15.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.2% 12.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.2% 11.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.8% 6.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.1% 4.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst