Speaker summary
⁠57%2 analyzed articles/videos408.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jarvis results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 29.6% saturation with 207 hits. Analysis detected 908.036 faulty-reasoning hits from 408.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (26,928 of 28,364 speakers). This Jarvis is better (less manipulative) than 94.90% of the peer group.
Jarvis
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 408.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

5% percentile
02550751005.1% percentile
6.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos408.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 29.6%29.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 17.3%17.3%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 10.9%10.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 4.0%4.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 4.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos