Author summary
27%1 analyzed article/video341 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justice Wheeler results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Status Quo Bias, and Bandwagon, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 172 hits. Analysis detected 416 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,023 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,510 of 6,628 authors). This Justice Wheeler is worse (more manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group.
Justice Wheeler
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
63%Justice Wheeler (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,023
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

62% percentile
025507510062.1% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 16.8%16.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.5%1.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.1%1.1%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Author 1.5%1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Optimism Bias: Author 16.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos