Speaker summary
40%6 analyzed articles/videos104 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jared Golden results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Special Pleading, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.5% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 199 faulty-reasoning hits from 104 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.5% and a BS Rank of 19% (22,988 of 28,364 speakers). This Jared Golden is better (less manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group.
Jared Golden
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

19% percentile
025507510019.0% percentile
13.5% BS Score6 analyzed videos104 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 23.2%23.2%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 18.9%18.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 18.9%18.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 3.7%3.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 30.5%30.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 3.7%3.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 3.7%3.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 30.5%, sitewide 26.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 3.7%Special Pleading: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 0.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate