Speaker summary
⁠35%1 analyzed article/video320.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Janie Charleston results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 376 faulty-reasoning hits from 320.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (35,290 of 37,915 speakers). This Janie Charleston is better (less manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group.
Janie Charleston
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠7%Janie Charleston (selected)8%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 320.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751006.9% percentile
7.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos320.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 20.8%20.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 15.9%15.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 4.5%4.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 12.4%12.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 1.0%1.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 1.6%1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos