Author summary
4% 1 analyzed article/video 4,276 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kia Gregory results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 3.2% saturation with 550 hits . Analysis detected 4,339 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,104 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.7% and a BS Rank of 2% (8,172 of 8,290 authors). This Kia Gregory is better (less manipulative) than 98.60% of the peer group. Kia Gregory
Author details
Total words: 17,104
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.4% percentile 0.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles17.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst