Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video58 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Janice Holowka results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Unattributed Quote, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 63.6% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 210.666 faulty-reasoning hits from 58 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (14,465 of 28,364 speakers). This Janice Holowka is better (less manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
Janice Holowka
Speaker details
Total words: 58
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510049.0% percentile
31.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos58 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 63.6%63.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 37.5%37.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 28.7%28.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 19.3%19.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 18.2%18.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 19.3%19.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 12.5%12.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 63.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 37.5%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 28.7%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos