Speaker summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video135 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Janet Martinez results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, False Dilemma, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 31.5% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 302 faulty-reasoning hits from 135 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (21,969 of 28,364 speakers). This Janet Martinez is better (less manipulative) than 77.50% of the peer group.
Janet Martinez
Speaker details
Total words: 135
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

23% percentile
025507510022.5% percentile
15.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos135 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 31.5%31.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 22.1%22.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos