Author summary
74% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,795 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gisselle Medina results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,409 hits . Analysis detected 10,837 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,385 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 33% (4,272 of 6,348 authors). This Gisselle Medina is better (less manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group. Gisselle Medina
Author details
Total words: 11,385
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.7% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.4% 12.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst