Speaker summary
65%2 analyzed articles/videos509 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Janay Kingsberry results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Quote-first Misdirection, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 110 hits. Analysis detected 493.887 faulty-reasoning hits from 509 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.9% and a BS Rank of 10% (25,777 of 28,364 speakers). This Janay Kingsberry is better (less manipulative) than 90.90% of the peer group.
Janay Kingsberry
Speaker details
Total words: 509
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

9% percentile
02550751009.1% percentile
8.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos509 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 15.7%15.7%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 23.7%23.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 11.1%Straw Man: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate