Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video76 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jan Newton results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Loss Aversion, and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 82.9% saturation with 63 hits. Analysis detected 230.667 faulty-reasoning hits from 76 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 43.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (10,474 of 26,155 speakers). This Jan Newton is worse (more manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Jan Newton
Speaker details
Total words: 76
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510060.0% percentile
43.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos76 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 82.9%82.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 46.0%46.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 57.5%57.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 46.0%46.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 36.8%36.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 17.1%17.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Anecdotal: Speaker 82.9%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 57.5%, sitewide 15.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 46.0%, sitewide 2.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 46.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 36.8%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 1.9%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos