Speaker summary
⁠43%1 analyzed article/video99.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jan Hilfer results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Bandwagon, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 158 faulty-reasoning hits from 99.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (20,571 of 28,364 speakers). This Jan Hilfer is better (less manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group.
Jan Hilfer
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 99.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

28% percentile
025507510027.5% percentile
17.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos99.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 20.0%20.0%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 17.3%17.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 25.3%25.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 12.7%12.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 15.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 19.2%Bandwagon: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos