Speaker summary
⁠41%1 analyzed article/video64.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jamie Sorcher results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Primacy Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 67.7% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 150 faulty-reasoning hits from 64.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,441 of 28,364 speakers). This Jamie Sorcher is better (less manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group.
Jamie Sorcher
Speaker details
Total words: 64.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510049.1% percentile
31.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos64.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 67.7%67.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 35.4%35.4%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 17.7%17.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 20.8%20.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 14.6%14.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 67.7%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 35.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 5.3%Primacy Effect: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 0.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos