Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,536 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stewart Wolpin results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Anecdotal , and Confirmation Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 29.7% saturation with 3,968 hits . Analysis detected 15,135 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,359 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 61% (2,468 of 6,316 authors). This Stewart Wolpin is worse (more manipulative) than 60.90% of the peer group. Stewart Wolpin
Author details
Total words: 13,359
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.9% percentile 3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles13.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 29.7% 29.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.7% 4.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 7.4% 7.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 29.7%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.4%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst