Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Jamie Sorcher results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 32.2% saturation with 2,816 hits. Analysis detected 9,005 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,751 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,363 authors). This Jamie Sorcher is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Jamie Sorcher
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Jamie Sorcher (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 8,751
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 32.2%32.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.8%3.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 5.5%5.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 32.2%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos