Speaker summary
â 94% 1 analyzed article/video 111 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Zogby results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Halo Effect , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 56% saturation with 102 hits . Analysis detected 385.456 faulty-reasoning hits from 111 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.5% and a BS Rank of â 52% (13,613 of 28,364 speakers). This James Zogby is worse (more manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group. James Zogby
Speaker details
Total words: 111
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.0% percentile 33.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos111 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0â100%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 80.0% 80.0% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 57.6% 57.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 56.0% 56.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 28.0% 28.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 28.0% 28.0% No True Scotsman Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 17.6% 17.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 17.6% 17.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 12.2% 12.2% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% Begging the Question: Speaker 80.0%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 57.6%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Speaker 56.0%, sitewide 6.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 28.0%, sitewide 0.8% Halo Effect: Speaker 28.0%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 7.5% No True Scotsman: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 0.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.4% Begging the Question Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst