Speaker summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video57.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Woods results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Unattributed Quote, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 48.8% saturation with 31.5 hits. Analysis detected 95.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 57.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (14,575 of 28,364 speakers). This James Woods is better (less manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group.
James Woods
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 57.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510048.6% percentile
30.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos57.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 48.8%48.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 24.4%24.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 25.6%25.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 24.4%24.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 48.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos