Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 649 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anna Kramer results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 356 hits . Analysis detected 2,770 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,596 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 69% (1,934 of 6,244 authors). This Anna Kramer is worse (more manipulative) than 69.00% of the peer group. Anna Kramer
Author details
Total words: 2,596
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.0% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.7% 13.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.2% 13.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 6.7% 6.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.8% 6.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.4% 9.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 2.0% Halo Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 4.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Burden of Proof: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst