Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video61.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Parkinson results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Genetic Fallacy, and Indoctrination, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 212.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 61.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 68.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (5,960 of 28,364 speakers). This James Parkinson is worse (more manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group.
James Parkinson
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠79%James Parkinson (selected)69%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 61.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510079.0% percentile
68.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos61.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 75.0%75.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%In-Group Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 15.9%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Amber Waves of Grease⁠41%
Slate Magazine⁠69%By Chason Gordon⁠0%7/3/2026, 2:45:01 AM