Speaker summary
⁠49%4 analyzed articles/videos157 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James P. Sutton results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 57.1% saturation with 177 hits. Analysis detected 263 faulty-reasoning hits from 157 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 28.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (15,492 of 28,364 speakers). This James P. Sutton is better (less manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group.
James P. Sutton
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510045.4% percentile
28.3% BS Score4 analyzed videos157 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 57.1%57.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 7.7%7.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 57.1%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 6.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos