Author summary
5% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,386 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Sipes results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Halo Effect , and Loss Aversion , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 989 hits . Analysis detected 2,773 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,986 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 14% (5,713 of 6,629 authors). This Daniel Sipes is better (less manipulative) than 86.20% of the peer group. Daniel Sipes
Author details
Total words: 8,986
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.8% percentile 1.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 11.0% 11.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.4%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 11.0%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.3%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst