Speaker summary
41% 5 analyzed articles/videos 276 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Clyburn results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 26.4% saturation with 134 hits . Analysis detected 657.58 faulty-reasoning hits from 276 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of 8% (26,323 of 28,364 speakers). This James Clyburn is better (less manipulative) than 92.80% of the peer group. James Clyburn
Speaker details
Total words: 276
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.2% percentile 7.9% BS Score5 analyzed videos276 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 26.4% 26.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 12.9% 12.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 15.0% 15.0% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 9.3% 9.3% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 26.4%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Composition/Division: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 2.7% Halo Effect: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst