Speaker summary
⁠57%2 analyzed articles/videos74.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Beere results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 67.5% saturation with 63.45 hits. Analysis detected 211.45 faulty-reasoning hits from 74.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 34.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (13,254 of 28,364 speakers). This James Beere is worse (more manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
James Beere
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 74.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510053.3% percentile
34.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos74.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 67.5%67.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 17.5%17.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 17.5%17.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 17.5%17.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 17.5%17.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Begging the Question: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 67.5%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos