Author summary
⁠12%1 analyzed article/video1,834 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tasneem Raja results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Halo Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 323 hits. Analysis detected 2,298 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,502 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (5,811 of 6,359 authors). This Tasneem Raja is better (less manipulative) than 91.40% of the peer group.
Tasneem Raja
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠9%Tasneem Raja (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,502
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

9% percentile
02550751008.6% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos