Speaker summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video67.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jaime Coulter results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Optimism Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 67 hits. Analysis detected 206 faulty-reasoning hits from 67.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 76.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (5,231 of 28,182 speakers). This Jaime Coulter is worse (more manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
Jaime Coulter
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠82%Jaime Coulter (selected)77%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 67.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510081.4% percentile
76.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos67.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 53.7%53.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 53.7%53.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 53.7%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 53.7%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos