Speaker summary
⁠54%2 analyzed articles/videos53.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jacob Howard results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 66% saturation with 62 hits. Analysis detected 100 faulty-reasoning hits from 53.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 35.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (13,027 of 28,364 speakers). This Jacob Howard is worse (more manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
Jacob Howard
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 53.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510054.1% percentile
35.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos53.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 66.0%66.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 20.2%20.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 20.2%20.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 66.0%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 26.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos