Speaker summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video54.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jacob Helberg results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 58% saturation with 33.667 hits. Analysis detected 76.667 faulty-reasoning hits from 54.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 46.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (10,624 of 28,364 speakers). This Jacob Helberg is worse (more manipulative) than 62.50% of the peer group.
Jacob Helberg
Speaker details
Total words: 54.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

63% percentile
025507510062.5% percentile
46.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos54.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 48.3%48.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 58.0%58.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 33.3%33.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 58.0%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 48.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 11.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos