Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video77 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jack Schreier results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Confirmation Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 77 hits. Analysis detected 253 faulty-reasoning hits from 77 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 65.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,394 of 28,364 speakers). This Jack Schreier is worse (more manipulative) than 77.50% of the peer group.
Jack Schreier
Speaker details
Total words: 77
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510077.5% percentile
65.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos77 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 57.1%57.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 57.1%57.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 57.1%57.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 57.1%57.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 57.1%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 57.1%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 57.1%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 57.1%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos