Speaker summary
⁠58%4 analyzed articles/videos379 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jack Rakove results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Primacy Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 109 hits. Analysis detected 981.027 faulty-reasoning hits from 379 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (24,678 of 28,364 speakers). This Jack Rakove is better (less manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group.
Jack Rakove
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 379
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

13% percentile
025507510013.0% percentile
10.7% BS Score4 analyzed videos379 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 25.9%25.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.6%5.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 9.0%9.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 25.9%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 11.1%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 0.1%Primacy Effect: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos