Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video59.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jack Money results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Ad Hominem, and Burden of Proof, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 69.4% saturation with 77 hits. Analysis detected 321.354 faulty-reasoning hits from 59.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 44.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,940 of 28,364 speakers). This Jack Money is worse (more manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group.
Jack Money
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 59.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

61% percentile
025507510061.4% percentile
44.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos59.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 65.3%65.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 69.4%69.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 38.7%38.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 38.7%38.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 30.6%30.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 30.6%30.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 38.7%38.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 69.4%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 65.3%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Speaker 38.7%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 38.7%, sitewide 0.4%Negativity Bias: Speaker 38.7%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos