Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video71 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jack Lundin results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 71 hits. Analysis detected 335.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 71 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 59.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,163 of 28,364 speakers). This Jack Lundin is worse (more manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group.
Jack Lundin
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 71
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510074.7% percentile
59.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos71 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 72.5%72.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 54.9%54.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 54.9%54.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 54.9%54.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 45.1%45.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 45.1%45.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 45.1%45.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 72.5%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 54.9%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 54.9%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 54.9%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 45.1%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 45.1%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 45.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos