Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video58.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jack Appleby results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Slippery Slope as the most egregious example at 67.9% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 195.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 58.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (8,183 of 28,364 speakers). This Jack Appleby is worse (more manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group.
Jack Appleby
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 58.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

71% percentile
025507510071.2% percentile
50.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos58.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 68.0%68.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 64.1%64.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 64.1%64.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 26.9%26.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 32.0%32.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Slippery Slope: Speaker 68.0%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 64.1%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 64.1%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 32.0%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos