Speaker summary
⁠66%2 analyzed articles/videos78.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Israel Hayom results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ad Hominem, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 117 hits. Analysis detected 306 faulty-reasoning hits from 78.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 42.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (11,308 of 28,364 speakers). This Israel Hayom is worse (more manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group.
Israel Hayom
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠61%Israel Hayom (selected)43%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 78.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510060.1% percentile
42.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos78.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 56.5%56.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 28.3%28.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 28.2%28.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 28.3%28.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 28.3%28.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 28.3%28.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 56.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Speaker 28.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos