Speaker summary
⁠43%2 analyzed articles/videos576 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Isabella Williams results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 676.379 faulty-reasoning hits from 576 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (27,502 of 28,364 speakers). This Isabella Williams is better (less manipulative) than 97.00% of the peer group.
Isabella Williams
Speaker details
Total words: 576
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

3% percentile
02550751003.0% percentile
5.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos576 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos