WTOP32%

Students scramble after receiving email from Howard U. unenrolling them just before classes 64%

By Anna-Lysa Gayle82%

7/25/2026, 12:58:14 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 976 faulty-reasoning hits from 414 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 58.2% and a BS Rank of 64% (8,071 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 63.10% of the article peer group.

More than 500 recent high school graduates received an email stating they were no longer able to attend Howard University, leaving many heartbroken or in tears just a few weeks before classes begin. 
In a TikTok video with more than 377,000 views, Isabella Williams said she received the email, crying as she described the situation. 
“We had a remaining balance, and they said that there was really no other avenue for us. 
And if we wanted to, we could transfer in as a transfer student at a later notice. 
And they gave us a few links if we wanted to get scholarship reimbursement if anything had already been sent,” Williams said. 
The university told WTOP the email was sent out to 502 students who had not satisfied the payment requirement for enrollment at the prestigious historically Black university in D.C. 
“What we did was created a communication, which I think has been disseminated quite broadly, sharing that we respected that they no longer wish to continue their educational journey at Howard,” Senior Vice President for Enrollment Management and Student Success Keyana Scales said. 
The university set a July 10 deadline for payments and certain financial aid documentation, but incoming freshmen said the process was not clear. 
“It was kind of confusing for all of us, for the majority of us, at least of the hundreds of students that I talked to at this point. 
All of us had either pending external scholarships, loans that were given to us by Howard University or military stipends,” Williams said. 
Since sending the email, Scales said the university has heard back from many students who intended to enroll but were having difficulty with the process. 
She said the university is going through each student’s inquiry one by one and will restore enrollment “if needed.” 
At last count, Scales said, 46 students had been reenrolled, including a student who drove from North Carolina on Friday to restore her status. 
Williams drove from Alabama on Friday to clarify her status as well. 
“It felt like it was almost life or death. 
And I know it’s not, and I know that I will do great things regardless of that. 
But this was something that I’ve been looking forward to for so long. 
I’m literally supposed to move in on Saturday. 
I just got word that I’m still able to,” Williams said. 
WTOP’s Thomas Robertson contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 16.4%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 7.3%WTOP: 3.2%Confirmation Bias16.4%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 22.2%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 9.2%WTOP: 3.6%Availability Heuristic22.2%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 9.0%WTOP: 8.1%Framing Effect3.1%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 1.0%WTOP: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 7.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 2.3%WTOP: 0.6%Status Quo Bias7.0%This article: 3.1%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 1.0%WTOP: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect3.1%This article: 17.4%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 7.2%WTOP: 2.2%Optimism Bias17.4%This article: 7.7%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 2.6%WTOP: 1.7%Pessimism Bias7.7%This article: 14.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 11.0%WTOP: 8.5%Negativity Bias14.0%This article: 5.3%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 1.8%WTOP: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias5.3%This article: 10.4%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 3.5%WTOP: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error10.4%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 2.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.7%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 4.5%WTOP: 1.4%Recency Bias7.7%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 2.3%WTOP: 4.6%Appeal to Authority7.0%This article: 2.2%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.7%WTOP: 1.0%False Dilemma2.2%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 16.4%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 7.7%WTOP: 3.0%Hasty Generalization16.4%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 13.3%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 10.5%WTOP: 4.3%Appeal to Emotion13.3%This article: 10.4%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 3.5%WTOP: 0.7%Begging the Question10.4%This article: 6.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 2.0%WTOP: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 16.2%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 8.1%WTOP: 1.4%Anecdotal16.2%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.4%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 3.8%WTOP: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.4%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.8%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 2.3%WTOP: 1.6%Unattributed Quote6.8%This article: 3.1%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 1.0%WTOP: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection3.1%This article: 21.5%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 10.5%WTOP: 4.0%Biased Writer Voice21.5%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 0.0%WTOP: 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 7.0%Anna-Lysa Gayle: 2.3%WTOP: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…7.0%

414 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers79%attributed speech88writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageIsabella Williams • 22 words • 0.0% coverageIsabella Williams • 17 words • 100.0% coverageIsabella Williams • 17 words • 0.0% coverageIsabella Williams • 22 words • 0.0% coverageHoward University • 29 words • 100.0% coverageKeyana Scales • 43 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageIsabella Williams • 28 words • 0.0% coverageIsabella Williams • 22 words • 0.0% coverageKeyana Scales • 25 words • 0.0% coverageKeyana Scales • 19 words • 0.0% coverageKeyana Scales • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageIsabella Williams • 9 words • 0.0% coverageIsabella Williams • 17 words • 0.0% coverageIsabella Williams • 13 words • 0.0% coverageIsabella Williams • 8 words • 0.0% coverageIsabella Williams • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Howard University

100%flagged-word coverage
29 attributed words8.9% of attributed speech92% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Howard University: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-52.3 ptsWriter: 52.3%Howard University: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-14.8 ptsWriter: 14.8%Howard University: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.