Keyword summary
66% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,114 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Financial Aid results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 1,595 hits . Analysis detected 9,281 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,529 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 39% (22,078 of 35,675 keywords). This Financial Aid is better (less manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group. Financial Aid
Keyword details
Total words: 8,529
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.1% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst