Speaker summary
⁠50%1 analyzed article/video239 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Isabella Walker results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 251.349 faulty-reasoning hits from 239 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (22,938 of 28,364 speakers). This Isabella Walker is better (less manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group.
Isabella Walker
Speaker details
Total words: 239
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

19% percentile
025507510019.1% percentile
13.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos239 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 18.4%18.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 18.4%18.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos