Author summary
22% 1 analyzed article/video 904 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jyl Benson results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 249 hits . Analysis detected 1,663 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,712 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (2,983 of 6,628 authors). This Jyl Benson is worse (more manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group. Jyl Benson
Author details
Total words: 2,712
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.0% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.9% 5.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.2% 9.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.9%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.5% Special Pleading: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.3% Primacy Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Burden of Proof: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst