Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video476 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Irene Silva results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 31.9% saturation with 151.836 hits. Analysis detected 790.656 faulty-reasoning hits from 476 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (26,569 of 28,364 speakers). This Irene Silva is better (less manipulative) than 93.70% of the peer group.
Irene Silva
Speaker details
Total words: 476
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

6% percentile
02550751006.3% percentile
7.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos476 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 31.9%31.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 11.1%11.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 4.7%4.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 4.4%4.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 31.9%, sitewide 3.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 2.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.3%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos