Author summary
65% 1 analyzed article/video 938 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kyle Garcia Takata results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 376 hits . Analysis detected 2,196 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,814 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,128 of 6,350 authors). This Kyle Garcia Takata is worse (more manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group. Kyle Garcia Takata
Author details
Total words: 2,814
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.5% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 13.4% 13.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.6% 10.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.6%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 13.4%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Horn Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst