Speaker summary
⁠76%2 analyzed articles/videos35.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran's military command results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 185 faulty-reasoning hits from 35.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (1,898 of 26,848 speakers). This Iran's military command is worse (more manipulative) than 92.90% of the peer group.
Iran's military command
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

93% percentile
025507510092.9% percentile
100.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos35.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos