Speaker summary
⁠94%2 analyzed articles/videos65 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran’s Energy Ministry results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 164 faulty-reasoning hits from 65 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 84.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (5,009 of 28,364 speakers). This Iran’s Energy Ministry is worse (more manipulative) than 82.30% of the peer group.
Iran’s Energy Ministry
Speaker details
Total words: 65
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510082.3% percentile
84.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos65 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 52.3%52.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 52.3%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos