Speaker summary
41% 19 analyzed articles/videos 227 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iranian officials results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Recency Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 78 hits . Analysis detected 496 faulty-reasoning hits from 227 analyzed words across 19 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.9% and a BS Rank of 10% (25,755 of 28,364 speakers). This Iranian officials is better (less manipulative) than 90.80% of the peer group. Iranian officials
Speaker details
Total words: 227
Article count: 19
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.2% percentile 8.9% BS Score19 analyzed videos227 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 22.2% 22.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 14.5% 14.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 14.5% 14.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 14.5% 14.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 19.5% 19.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 12.2% 12.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 6.9% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 3.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.4% Slippery Slope: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst