Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video18 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Refugee Assistance Project results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 18 hits. Analysis detected 90 faulty-reasoning hits from 18 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (1,938 of 28,364 speakers). This International Refugee Assistance Project is worse (more manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group.
International Refugee Assistance Project
Speaker details
Total words: 18
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

93% percentile
025507510093.2% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos18 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos