Speaker summary
⁠94%2 analyzed articles/videos133 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Monetary Fund (IMF) results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 75.9% saturation with 101 hits. Analysis detected 296 faulty-reasoning hits from 133 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 31.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,204 of 28,268 speakers). This International Monetary Fund (IMF) is better (less manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group.
International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Speaker details
Total words: 133
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510049.8% percentile
31.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos133 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 75.9%75.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 27.8%27.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 24.1%24.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 27.8%27.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 27.8%27.8%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 27.8%27.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 75.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 27.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 27.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.8%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 27.8%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos