Speaker summary
⁠57%5 analyzed articles/videos197.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Energy Agency (IEA) results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 67.4% saturation with 211 hits. Analysis detected 457 faulty-reasoning hits from 197.5 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 24.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (17,253 of 28,364 speakers). This International Energy Agency (IEA) is better (less manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group.
International Energy Agency (IEA)

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

39% percentile
025507510039.2% percentile
24.3% BS Score5 analyzed videos197.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 67.4%67.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 18.9%18.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 18.9%18.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 21.1%21.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 10.9%10.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 67.4%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos